

- #Zimbra web client sign in copyright © 2005 2009 software#
- #Zimbra web client sign in copyright © 2005 2009 code#
- #Zimbra web client sign in copyright © 2005 2009 windows#
Rengolin, your post above only serves to show that you don't understand MySQL internals, that you haven't really read the Zimbra code very well, and that you've really not done any real testing or evaluation.Ġ) Even though you make a pseudo-exact claim of "10 or 20" users, it is clear you aren't basing this on any actual testing.I have actually done performance testing and I can say that the server scales extremely well under a wide variety of performance tests.ġ) Separating users into databases is NOT a bad thing for a mailserver. It's a sign that other people see the same promise for Zimbra that we do. This is a critical milestone in every attempt to build a community around a product, and I'm glad to see they reached it so quickly. For example, I was pleased to learn that the forums have taken on a life of their own: there are people answering hard technical questions who aren't Zimbra employees. There was more, a lot more, that we talked about. If I never have to speak IMAP again, I'll be a happy man. I'm most psyched about the promise of a well thought-out set of email and calendar APIs that I can develop against. Anyone who's ever poked at the UW IMAP server or tried to decode a MIME attachment knows what a misery it can be. The Zimbra server ties together Postfix, MySQL, OpenLDAP, Tomcat, and more, building an integrated platform out of what used to be a patchy chaotic mix of protocols, libraries, and file formats. And (thanks to OpenSSL) all their communication between server and client happens over encrypted channels.
#Zimbra web client sign in copyright © 2005 2009 software#
It's centralizing a lot of the security controls to where the antispam antivirus software is a known quantity. Yes, you can even view Word files as HTML. They decode attachments on the server and the administrator can control which attachments make it to the browser. It's all Java, so the buffer overflow issue is gone. I talked to them about security and I like what I hear. They are actively building multiple device support, including a Blackberry client (you should see how Rael perks up every time they discuss how that's coming along-it's so cute!).
#Zimbra web client sign in copyright © 2005 2009 windows#
You don't even need Windows clients-the Ajax client means anyone can use it. You can do all the group calendaring and meeting management that Exchange provides, without needing a tricked-out Windows box grinding away on the backend. Their tests show 2-3x performance over Exchange with the same workload, and they have drop-in compatibility with Outlook and other Exchange-built clients.įor administrators, the idea of Exchange without Exchange is sexy. The folks at Zimbra have released it as open source, not just the Ajax client and the toolkit used to build it, but the server as well. There's an ocean of people who want the Exchange feature set without the Exchange nightmares: administration, performance, and security.

The server platform is the Microsoft Exchange killer we've all wanted.

The Ajax webmail client is slick and featureful, but it's really just a demo of their underlying server system. Here's the story you're not reading about: Zimbra is much more than an Ajax mail client. In the last month they've been at the center of blog and Slashdot stories, and they've seen huge uptake. We'd seen them a month or so ago, and I've been speaking to them through the year, but it was good to catch up. Rael and I had our first meeting of Web 2.0 with the folks from Zimbra.
